Pick up know-how for tackling diseases, pests and weeds.
Farm bill, farm marketing, agribusiness webinars, & farm policy.
Find tactics for healthy livestock and sound forages.
Scheduling and methods of irrigation.
Explore our Extension locations around the state.
Commercial row crop production in Arkansas.
Agriculture weed management resources.
Use virtual and real tools to improve critical calculations for farms and ranches.
Learn to ID forages and more.
Explore our research locations around the state.
Get the latest research results from our county agents.
Our programs include aquaculture, diagnostics, and energy conservation.
Keep our food, fiber and fuel supplies safe from disaster.
Private, Commercial & Non-commercial training and education.
Specialty crops including turfgrass, vegetables, fruits, and ornamentals.
Find educational resources and get youth engaged in agriculture.
Gaining garden smarts and sharing skills.
Timely tips for the Arkansas home gardener.
Creating beauty in and around the home.
Maintenance calendar, and best practices.
Coaxing the best produce from asparagus to zucchini.
What’s wrong with my plants? The clinic can help.
Featured trees, vines, shrubs and flowers.
Ask our experts plant, animal, or insect questions.
Enjoying the sweet fruits of your labor.
Herbs, native plants, & reference desk QA.
Growing together from youth to maturity.
Crapemyrtles, hydrangeas, hort glossary, and weed ID databases.
Get beekeeping, honey production, and class information.
Grow a pollinator-friendly garden.
Schedule these timely events on your gardening calendar.
Equipping individuals to lead organizations, communities, and regions.
Home to the Center for Rural Resilience and Workforce Development.
Guiding entrepreneurs from concept to profit.
Position your business to compete for government contracts.
Find trends, opportunities, and impacts.
Providing unbiased information to enable educated votes on critical issues.
Increase your knowledge of public issues & get involved.
Research-based connection to government and policy issues.
Support Arkansas local food initiatives.
Read about our efforts.
Find workforce info and Economic Development Administration resources.
Preparing for and recovering from disasters.
Licensing for forestry and wildlife professionals.
Preserving water quality and quantity.
Cleaner air for healthier living.
Firewood & bioenergy resources.
Managing a complex forest ecosystem.
Read about nature across Arkansas and the U.S.
Learn to manage wildlife on your land.
Soil quality and its use here in Arkansas.
Learn to ID unwanted plant and animal visitors.
Timely updates from our specialists.
Eating right and staying healthy.
Ensuring safe meals.
Take charge of your well-being.
Cooking with Arkansas foods.
Making the most of your money.
Making sound choices for families and ourselves.
Nurturing our future.
Get tips for food, fitness, finance, and more!
Explore the art of homesteading with our expert guidance.
Understanding aging and its effects.
Giving back to the community.
Managing safely when disaster strikes.
Listen to our latest episode!
Subscribe to Post Updates from Arkansas Row Crops
Sign Up for Newsletter Updates
Subscribe to SMS Updates from Arkansas Row Crops
Listen to Our Latest Crops Podcast
Listen Now
Hot Publications
Suggested Links
Rice Farming
Cotton Farming
Peanut Grower
Delta Farm Press
by Michael Emerson, Brandon Baker, Nicole Emerson, and Travis Faske - November 14, 2024
The southern root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) is a major threat to soybean production and is the most yield-limiting plant-pathogenic nematode that affects soybean production in the Mid-South. It is found in nearly all soybean counties in Arkansas and can cause significant (>70%) grain yield losses when a susceptible variety is planted in a field with a high population density of southern root-knot nematode (RKN).
In this study, 56 commercially available soybean varieties marketed as suitable for production in southern RKN fields were screened. Varieties were divided into 4 experiments (Table 1 to 4) based on maturity group. Varieties were planted in a randomized complete block design with four replications per entry. Plots consisted of 4 rows, 30 ft long, spaced 30 in. apart, and separated by a 5-ft fallow alley. Plots were planted on 7 June at a seeding rate of 150,000 seeds/A. Six root systems were arbitrarily sampled at the R5 growth stage from non-harvest rows of each plot used for assessing southern RKN host susceptibility. The final nematode population (Pf) density averaged 648 second-stage juveniles (J2)/100 cm3 soil at harvest for susceptible checks across all experiments. This density is considered severe for soybean production in Arkansas. The post-harvest threshold for southern root-knot nematode on soybean in Arkansas is J2 60/100 cm3 soil. The two center rows of each plot were harvested on 15 Oct (maturity group IV) and 21 Oct (maturity group V). These results and those on the UA variety testing website can be helpful for variety selection for the 2025 cropping season.
Reports from previous trials (2016 to 2023) are available on the UADA website at https://www.uaex.uada.edu/farm-ranch/pest-management/plant-disease/publications.aspx
What else is important: Overall, the severity (percent of root system galled) was lower than last year, so the screen was not as good as in 2023. For example, Delta Grow ‘DB46XF54’ had a gall rating of 51.1% (VS) in 2023 and 16.4% (MS) in 2024. However, and overall, selecting a variety that is less susceptible will ensure a greater yield than a more susceptible one in a nematode infested field. For example, Pioneer ‘P46Z53E’ would have a lower gall rating and greater yield than Delta Grow ‘DG46E30’, but not Revere ‘48-F72’, if planted in the same field. Consult the cross-reference guide for soybean varieties to ensure different varieties selected are not the same genetics.
Why is final nematode population density or “Pf” important? The timing for these samples would be comparable to fall nematodes samples collected in commercial fields. Therefore, soybean varieties would expect to perform similarly when the nematode population density AND soil texture class (e.g., sandy loam) was similar. Overall, individual varieties will show a greater percentage of root system galled or susceptibility when grown in soils with a greater percentage of sand and nematode densities that are similar to the final nematode densities reported here. Furthermore, and more importantly, grain yield for individual varieties will decrease with increased drought stress AND when nematode densities are similar to that reported.
Table 1. Field performance of several MG IV soybean varieties in a southern root-knot nematode infested field. The soil texture was sandy loam soil (51% sand, 47% silt, and 3% clay). (Pf = 576 second-stage juveniles/100 cm3 soil.)
Varietya
Percent root system galledc
Yield (bu/A)
Revere CT4413E3S
8.1 b-eb
78.4 a
AgriGold 4884E3
6.7 c-f
77.3 a
Pioneer P46Z53E
1.6 gh
76.5 ab
Armor 49-E15S
7.5 cde
74.1 abc
Pioneer P43A42X (check)
0.5 h
73.6 abc
GoSoy 493E22N
3.9 e-h
71.2 a-d
Delta Grow DG46E30 (check)
11.5 a-d
71.0 a-d
Progeny P4444 RXS
5.6 d-g
70.2 a-d
Delta Grow DG46E10
2.0 fgh
70.1 a-d
Armor 46-F35S
7.8 c-f
68.4 a-e
Revere 48-F72
5.8 c-g
65.4 a-e
Seitec Genetics B457XF/STS
13.7 a-d
64.8 a-e
Delta Grow DG46X54
16.4 a-d
60.6 b-e
17.0 a-d
58.2 cde
Seitic Genetics 479XF
11.1 a-d
54.8 de
Delta Grow DG47XF90
22.2 ab
54.3 de
Revere 49-F36
18.5 abc
52.3 e
Integra XF4875S
25.5 a
a Roundup Ready, Enlist, Xtend, & Xtend Flex variety.
b Means with different letters within a column indicate a significant difference at α = 0.05 according to Tukey’s HSD test.
c Susceptibility was based on the percentage of root system galled where 0-1.0 = VR, 1.1-4.0 = R, 4.1-9.0 = MR, 9.1-20.0 = MS, 20.1-40.0 = S, 40.1-100.0 = VS.
Table 2. Field performance of several MG IV soybean varieties in a southern root-knot nematode infested field, experiment 2. The soil texture was silt loam soil (37% sand, 59% silt, and 5% clay). (Pf = 1,227 second-stage juveniles/100 cm3 soil.)
Pioneer P43Z44SE
1.4 eb
62.0 a
Delta Grow DG43XF65
13.7 a-e
59.1 a
Delta Grow DG49E90
8.9 b-e
58.6 a
Delta Grow DG47E70
4.8 cde
58.3 ab
2.8 de
58.0 ab
Delta Grow DG 4940GLY
1.8 e
57.4 ab
Innvictis A4448X
8.5 b-e
57.3 ab
Revere 45-F92
3.8 de
56.6 ab
Stine 49EE21
55.8 abc
NK49-U9E3S
10.8 a-e
54.6 a-d
Progeny P4724XFS
9.0 b-e
54.2 a-d
Delta Grow DG48XF33STS
9.4 b-e
52.3 a-d
Armor 49-F05
11.1 a-e
51.8 a-d
Revere 44-F44
13.9 a-e
46.9 b-e
16.0 a-d
44.2 cde
Delta Grow 48XF70
32.4 a
43.8 de
Delta Grow DG4880GLY (check)
25.3 ab
40.0 e
Asgrow 45XF3
20.8 abc
38.2 e
Table 3. Field performance of several MG V soybean varieties in a southern root-knot nematode infested field, experiment 3. The soil texture was sandy loam soil (49% sand, 49% silt, and 3% clay). (Pf = 469 second-stage juveniles/100 cm3 soil.)
NK58-Y9XF
3.6 cdb
76.9 a
NK52-D6E3
6.1 bc
73.8 ab
Pioneer P53Z60LX
2.8 cd
71.3 abc
Asgrow AG56XF2
3.5 cd
70.8 a-d
Delta Grow DG55X25
5.8 bcd
69.3 a-e
Stine 52EG09
2.5 cd
67.4 a-e
Revere 5429E3
66.6 b-e
Stine 52EG99
3.7 cd
66.1 b-e
Armor 54-F34
2.1 cd
64.5 b-e
Pioneer P52A14SE (check)
0.9 d
64.2 b-e
Revere 53-F84
16.9 ab
64.0 b-e
Asgrow AG52XF5
5.1 cd
63.4 cde
Innvictis A5451XF
2.3 cd
60.8 de
Delta Grow DG53XF95/STS (check)
27.5 a
60.0 e
Table 4. Field performance of several MG V soybean varieties in a southern root-knot nematode infested field, experiment 3. The soil texture was silt loam soil (41% sand, 57% silt, and 3% clay). (Pf = 320 second-stage juveniles/100 cm3 soil.)
Revere CT5293E3
9.1 bcdb
81.4 a
Innvictis A5558X
6.8 cd
76.1 ab
Progeny P5554RX
7.1 cd
75.6 ab
NK56-Z6XFS
3.8 d
75.2 ab
Seitic Genetics H506 XF/STS
39.2 a
72.7 abc
NK52-V1XF
23.3 abc
68.6 bcd
8.2 d
64.0 cd
Innvictis A5813XF
7.2 bcd
63.0 d
28.7 ab
62.1 d
Delta Grow DG52E30
3.9 d
62.0 d
Progeny P5751XFS
Revere 5735XFS
3.0 d
Delta Grow DG55XF23
6.0 d
61.9 d
Delta Grow DG52XF90
29.5 ab
61.7 d
If you have any questions, please contact tfaske@uada.edu